It is a principle of political justice that  information pertaining to
a decision be considered before rather than after that decision is made.
For this reason, hailMaryShelley.com presents the question, have
Americans considered the information that supports the National
Journal's view of  ten years ago that Al Gore was the "most
determined advocate" for the Internet?    expert view

The exercise of "untried resources of mind," with which the
careful reader of Frankenstein becomes familiar, is most
useful in situations such as the  presidential campaign of
2000. Like Justine, who is condemned for an act she did not
commit, the whole population seems to "know" that Al Gore
claimed to have "invented the Internet." As in Justine's case,
in the campaign of 2000 evidence that Al Gore is not guilty of
exaggeration, but  that it is his detractors who are, is ignored.
Within the machinery of her novel, Mary Shelley also provides
means to review of the problem of "undeceiving" those whose
misguided actions run counter to actual progress toward
justice. The very difficult problem of confronting seemingly
overwhelming odds, when dealing with such ignorance, often
seems so daunting that frequently concerted efforts are not
carried forward to correct the problem. In this aspect, Mary
Shelley's father, William Godwin, provides illumination worth
making use of. The situation Godwin faced during the Terror
of 1794 did indeed seem hopeless. Most people were resigned
to the seemingly unstoppable process the government had
begun, the trial and conviction of dissenters as traitors. Yet,
by addressing the flaws in the process in an analysis written
over a period of two days, Godwin's Cursory Strictures,
published in the Morning Chronicle, resulted in a complete
reversal of the course of events. With the Internet we are
better able to publish corrections than has ever before been
possible.
".... though the effects of truth may be obscured
for a time, they will break out in the sequel with
double lustre." Godwin
We hope that those, distressed  by the way in which
the 2000 campaign has been subjected to forces of
distortion, will understand that the old axiom has
a corollary. Not only may it be said that those who
do not know history are condemned to repeat it,
a statement that suggests little progress, but it may
also be said that those who do not know history
may be unable to repeat the finer moments in
the course of human events. Here are a couple of
links to www.hailMaryShelley.com pages related
to this.  Morning Chronicle
         Terror of 1794 1st of two
         Terror of 1794 2nd of two
For information regarding participation in this
effort contact: Tom@HailMaryShelley.com
                 or ToMMLI@netscape.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

   opportunity